# \[bug\]discrepancy in PIN assignment and GPIO

**URL:** <https://forum.aircodenow.com/t/bug-discrepancy-in-pin-assignment-and-gpio/40>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [June 11, 2026, 3:29am UTC](https://forum.aircodenow.com/t/bug-discrepancy-in-pin-assignment-and-gpio/40 "2026-06-11T03:29:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ajay\_S](https://forum.aircodenow.com/user_avatar/forum.aircodenow.com/ajay_s/32/15_2.png) [@Ajay\_S](https://forum.aircodenow.com/u/Ajay_S)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2026, 3:29am UTC](https://forum.aircodenow.com/t/bug-discrepancy-in-pin-assignment-and-gpio/40/1 "2026-06-11T03:29:43Z")

</div>

I tried below prompt 🙂  
“blink led in every 1 second connected to pin number 14 to 20 on esp32 continusly.”  
the flow

 ![image](https://forum.smowcode.com/uploads/default/original/1X/01455854fd9b34582e01950dba1a485d1a4c5fb3.png)

summary 🙂

### Summary

"Built a new flow below the current graph.

### Flow creation successful, but a few requirements couldn’t be matched

- Library: `smow_pin`
- Node: `write`
- Clause: connected to pin number 14 to 20
- Reason: A single LED cannot be connected to multiple GPIO pins 14 through 20 at the same time without more detail. The request is ambiguous about whether to blink one LED on pin 14, blink LEDs on all pins 14 to 20, or sweep across that range.
- Suggested workaround: Specify whether you want one LED on pin 14 only, all pins 14 to 20 blinking together, or a sequence across pins 14 to 20."

I found discrepancy

1. I asked for pin number 14 in ESP32, BUT SC took GPIO\_14,  
the GPIO\_14 is pin number 17.
2. GOT code for only GPIO\_14